Kiawah plan meets taxpayer pockets
Hurricane Hugo ruptured a spit on Pawleys Island similar to the one on Kiawah Island. A very similar thing also happened in 1954.

The company that orchestrates new development on Kiawah Island says a spit of land off the southern end of their island is very stable, and that lawmakers should let them have access to tax-payer resources to encourage development.

But many say Kiawah Development Partners’ plan to develop the spit is fools gold and it’d be madness to allow access to federal flood insurance to encourage home ownership on the spit.

Javascript is required to view this map.

Generally, coastal areas are covered by the federal insurance but some areas fall in the “Coastal Barrier Resources System” and are considered too vulnerable and too ecologically important to be eligible for federal dollars. It’s a political, “No. I won’t buy you a car so you can drive it into that grocery store.”

And here’s why that law’s there: The spit of land, just south of Charleston County’s Beachwalker Park, shares a unique relationship with Seabrook Island, over the centuries the spit is joined only to Seabrook, or disappears completely, or becomes its own island.

Hurricane Hugo showed how this can play out on spits of land when it ruptured a spit on Pawleys Island similar to the one on Kiawah Island. A very similar thing also happened in 1954.

What’s it mean? And how’s it affect my pocket?

There’s nothing really stopping Kiawah Development Partners from building, but if they can get the land removed from the Coastal Barrier Resources System, it would make it more attractive to homeowners and make the land worth far more. And they had hoped our U.S. Rep. Henry Brown could get that classification changed.

But after a ton of outcry Brown removed his proposal to change the classification of the spit.

So now when you hear people talking about this spit, you’ll know what’s going on.

Want more background? Hop over to The Post and Courier. Want more rant? Head over to the Charleston City Paper.

Personally, I’ve always found building anywhere near the beach to be borderline madness. Wasn’t there something in the Bible about this?

Send to a friend Printer-friendly version

2 comments on this post

September 7th, 2008
10:26 am

Ken, how about using FACTS in your article? KIAWAH is NOT the correct nomenclature for this story.

Kiawah Development Partners is who wants to develop Captain Sam’s. Kiawah Development Partners is who will profit from this.

Believe me, there is a BIG difference between Kiawah Island and Kiawah Development Partners!

Many (most?) of the residents of Kiawah Island think developing Captain Sam’s is a very BAD idea. Dozens have sent comments to OCRM in an attempt to get a public hearing about this development.

Please do not add to the public perception that Kiawah is orchestrating this. It is KDP, NOT Kiawah Island.

— Posted by Guest.
September 7th, 2008
11:56 am

Yes, it does read ambiguously. The story’s been clarified to more clearly indicate the party pursuing development.

— Posted by Ken Hawkins (a site editor).

Post your comment

Required.
Required. Will be hidden.
Your comment will be reviewed, and will generally be posted if they are on topic and not viewed as abusive. To see your comment appear more quickly, we highly recommend creating an account before posting.